Text
1. In respect of the real estate listed in [Attachment 1],
A. (i) Defendant F shall share 5/165 of the shares, (ii) the Plaintiff A shall share 5/2640 of the shares.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 25, 2014, U, one of the parties’ relationship (i) U, an unmarried child, died on August 25, 2014.
B. The Defendant F (Defendant 1), Defendant GJHI (Defendant 2 through 5), and Defendant GJW (Defendant 2 through 5), ② the children of the network M (Death on October 1, 2002) are the deceased XY M (Defendant 8), and the spouse of the network X (Death on December 23, 2009) is the Defendant KL (Defendant 6, Defendant 7), ③ the children of the deceased X-M (Death on June 13, 2000), and the children of the deceased X (Death on December 23, 2009), as Defendant NPPR (Death on January 13, 200), and the deceased’s joint heir’s property as the deceased’s deceased deceased heir.
On the other hand, the plaintiffs are grandchildren of the deceased AB (Death on November 8, 194), and they claim that "in addition to the network V network WA3 of the above paragraph, the deceased U, the punishment of the deceased U, the deceased I, the deceased father of the deceased, the deceased father of the deceased, the deceased father of the deceased is also the deceased father of the deceased U, and the plaintiffs also constitute the deceased U co-inheritors."
B. Under the circumstances where the deceased U’s ownership transfer registration of Y with respect to shares of 40/100 among the real estate listed in the [Attachment List 1] and the real estate listed in [Attachment List 2 and 3] is alive by the deceased U, the registration of ownership transfer was completed for each of the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] and the real estate listed in [Attachment List 2 and 3] on March 26, 2014 with respect to each of the real estate listed in [Attachment 2 and 40/100 shares (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) on the ground of donation made on March 26, 2014.
[Y] On October 27, 2016, the Supreme Court rendered a judgment of conviction (Seoul Central District Court 2016No892) on the charge of a crime, such as the act of delegation in the name of the deceased U and the act of forging a gift contract, and became final and conclusive by the judgment of dismissal of appeal on February 3, 2017).
The Defendants filed a lawsuit as to each of the instant real estates against the Defendants, and accordingly, the Defendants’ ownership transfer registration (i.e., the net U.N.) against Y on May 26, 2014.