logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.21 2015나969
공제금청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as follows: "On the other hand, the evidence mentioned above, Gap evidence Nos. 7 and 8 (including each number), Eul evidence Nos. 9, and the whole purport of oral arguments are added to "the following circumstances that can be known, i.e., the 5th 11", and "the plaintiff who is the plaintiff of the network B's 40th th th th th th th th th th th th 2013, the above accident occurred," and 6th th th th th th th 2013, the Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. and Eth th th th th 2 th th th th 2013, the insurance contract as the insured of the network, even if there was an exemption clause that does not pay insurance money in the event of an accident caused by the insured's intention as the insured's death," and this is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

It is insufficient to reverse the conclusion of the judgment of the first instance on the basis of the fact-finding conducted by the G Hospital president.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow