logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.03.11 2015나6076
손해배상금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment are as follows: “Plaintiff A” and “Appointed C” as “Plaintiff C,” respectively; and “Plaintiff et al. filed a complaint with the Plaintiff et al. on the basis of the false records of sales at the main office of this case; however, the Defendant added “the fact that the Plaintiff et al. filed a complaint with the Plaintiff et al. on May 18, 2010 among the sales records prepared by Plaintiff A and kept in the main office of this case by the date of revocation of credit card approval based on the wind destroyed by the part of May 18, 2010 among the sales records kept in the main office of this case, and the fact that the investigation agency and the court stated with the same purport is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for deletion of the main office of Chapter 5, the same shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiffs' claims in this case are all dismissed without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is without merit, and it is so dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow