logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.09 2016나696
배당이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows: “The testimony was made” under Section 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and, in addition to adding “the Defendant appeared as a witness and testified to enter the instant apartment in April 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court 2012Da84039, the Seoul Southern District Court 201Da84039, which the Plaintiff raised against D, for the confirmation of the existence of the right of retention,” it is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited pursuant to the main text of Article 4

If so, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow