logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2016.06.29 2015누11984
허가취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Plaintiff’s additional assertion in the trial (the Plaintiff is a middle-standing enterprise specializing in breeding and distributing pigs 21 farms across the country. From mid 2013, 2013, the head office entered into a joint management agreement with the claim group around August 19, 2014 in consultation with the claim group for the purpose of resolving serious financial difficulties, and the operation of the farm of this case is normalization, and the livestock excreta in the farm of this case, which is an agricultural corporation, a specialized in breeding pigs, delegated by the claim group, has been entrusted to the farm of this case. Thus, livestock excreta in the farm of this case shall be treated properly in the future.

2. In light of the evidence submitted, the plaintiff's appeal of this case is justified as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices. The plaintiff's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow