The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The gist of the facts charged was that the Defendant operated a DNA farm that raises approximately KRW 7,00 pigs in Gyeonggi-gun C.

A. On January 11, 2017, the Defendant, at the entrance of the D farm located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, installed an air-line disinfection equipment at the G farm, and obstructed the traffic of a road with a width of about 3 meters at the entrance of the D farm (hereinafter “instant road”) on a concrete road with the width of 3 meters, including the victim E, etc., in order to ensure that the nearby vehicles pass through the said disinfection equipment, by installing a wooden board board (referring to approximately 1m: 82m in width, about 90cm in length: about 60cm in diameter, about 1m in height) and a drum ( about 1m in height), and obstructed the traffic of a road adjacent to the general public via traffic of the victim E and other general public.

B. On March 8, 2017, the Defendant obstructed traffic by blocking roads at the entrance of a D farm located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, by using the same method as paragraph (1) on the roads at which the Defendant interfered with traffic on the land, which was officially used for the traffic of the general public.

2. Even based on the facts charged in the judgment, the Defendant installed wooden plates and drums on the instant road in order for vehicles passing along the instant road to pass through disinfection facilities for vehicles, and the Defendant installed such facilities to prevent the drums of pigs farms run by themselves.

argument is asserted.

The prevention and blocking of the sources of relief is a major issue in the nation as a whole and the defendant also suffers a huge damage in the event of the occurrence of a cause of relief in his farm.

On February 8, 2017, between the date and time stated in the actual facts charged, the Defendant’s operation farm created approximately 3 km back from the milch farm (26, 33, 313 pages of investigation records), and the Defendant had experience of disposing of 5,00 mas of pigs as the dives station in 2010.

Also, according to the on-site photographs submitted by one prosecutor (17,18,47 to 53 of the investigation records) and the on-site photographs submitted by the defendant in the court, the defendant interfered with traffic.

. are identified.