The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a mobile communications agency employee who resides in the above address.

On May 16, 2014, at around 04:00, the Defendant was boarding the E-si driven by a witness C (D) for the use of the taxi, and was leaving the taxi in the earth without paying taxi expenses.

In the FJ office, the suspect took a fluent friend of the victim G, who is a police officer demanding the payment of taxi expenses to the taxi officer, and publicly insultingly insulting the victim by “spulp, flue” and brue, among one police officer, who is a police officer.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, the victim's withdrawal of the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of this case is recognized, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act