The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On October 19, 2013, around 23:35, the Defendant assaulted the victim by leaving the taxi at the front of the Kimhae-si apartment (the age of 67) operated by the victim D (the age of 67) and demanding the victim to pay the taxi expenses, on the ground that the victim had returned to the destination without speeding the taxi expenses, on the ground that he did not pay the taxi expenses.

B. At around 23:39 October 19, 2013, the Defendant, on the same grounds as the above 1.3, 2013, was voluntarily driven by the victim F slope belonging to the said E District, who was dispatched to the E District E District E District E District E District after receiving a report of 112 on the same grounds, and was asked by F to ask questions about the facts from F, while the said D’s observation, the Defendant made a public insult of F, “I see why I would see, and I would not speak from F, I would like to say, “I would not see why I would do so,” and “I would not see why I would see, if I will do so, I would not see it.”

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Articles 260(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the will of the victim, or only when the victim files a complaint. Since the victims submit an agreement to the effect that they do not wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, or withdraw a complaint, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) and (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.