The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, at around 10:30 on May 7, 2020, told her children under the influence of alcohol at the c elementary school building site C, which was located in 10:30 on May 7, 2020, and reported to the police that the victim D, who was the teacher of the above school, was found to be a school in the past and was recommended to refrain from entering the school by avoiding disturbance, but was reported to the Defendant. In the presence of the assistant principal of the school, the head of the administrative office, and students, etc., the Defendant sexually insulting the victim of the instant charges by publicly insulting him on the ground that the victim D, who was the teacher of the above school, was found to be a school in the past.

2. The instant case is an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the same Act.

However, the records show that the victim submitted a written agreement containing his/her intention of withdrawal of the complaint to the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.