logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.04.09 2017고단916
사기등
Text

Imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the defendant 1 and one year for each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the defendant 2 to 5.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On January 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Jeonju District Court, and was released as the revocation of detention on the ground that six months have elapsed since the date of detention at the Jeonju prison on March 25, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 24, 2017.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 916

1. On April 17, 2017, the Defendant posted a false sales notice to the effect that around 09:09, the Defendant sold D apartment units 101-807, Jinjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and on the Korean website, “sales of golf bags.” On the other hand, the Defendant sent the price to E who reported and contacted this article.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, since the defendant did not have the above golf banks, even if he received the price of the goods from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above golf banks to the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 160,00 from the victim to the new bank account (F) in his/her name on the same day, and by deceiving the victims four times from April 12, 2017 to April 17, 2017, and received KRW 753,00 in total from the victims by deceiving the victims by the said means as shown in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table.

"2017 Highest 2313"

2. On August 28, 2017, the Defendant posted a false letter stating that “a cart is sold” on the Internet car page of NA in the Defendant’s residence of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul), and reported the false statement to the victim I who sent the price to the victim I.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the above carcart and was planned to prepare funds to be used for gambling, etc., so even if he received money, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the carcart to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 153,000 won from the victim’s bank account (K) on the same day.

arrow