logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.19 2018고단5527
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, around July 21, 2018, at the Fel G guest room in Michuhol-gu Incheon, on July 21, 2018, at the Fel G guest room in Michuhol-gu, Incheon, Defendant A, in a de facto marital relationship with B and his house in a de facto marital relationship, was dissatisfied with the drinking as a drinking problem with another house in the next room in which the Defendant was diving.

The Defendant: (a) was found to have been at the seat of the Defendant and the Defendant, at the seat of the Hamman affiliated with the Hamman affiliated with the Hamban Police Station of the Incheon Michuhol-gu Police Station, which had been called to the scene after receiving a report of 112, to have the Defendant arrested the Defendant as the current criminal of assault; (b) while resisting at the port, the Defendant was trying to arrest the Defendant as the police officer; (c) while walking the Ham on several occasions, carried the mamb in the guest room, carried the coffee Ham, who was on the Hamb, and was on the Hamb’s Ham; and (d) was on the back.

J 순경이 피고인을 제지하자 손으로 그녀의 머리채를 잡아 흔들고 발로 그녀의 배를 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations and suppressions.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, and at the same place as that of paragraph 1, committed the act of the above Party A, reported the defects of the first policeman and Jman’s attempt to control A and arrest him as a current offender. However, Defendant B, by putting the police boom of the first policeman and boomed a computer monitor in the guest room, and threatened the first policeman.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation and suppression of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Each police statement made to J and I;

1. 112 reported data;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime committed by Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (defendant A);

1. Selection of penalty;

arrow