Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for eight months, and for six months, for Defendant C, respectively.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2016, the Defendants received a demand from Defendant C to increase the amount of singing room in addition to the drinking value from Defendant C’s employees at the F Age Club E, which was located in around 00:50 on June 1, 2016, and the said employees and vagabonds paid a difference in cash in the amount of singing room costs in addition to the drinking value calculated by the card, and that the said employees would be able to take the police as the police.

At the same time, the 112 report was made, and the victim H police officers belonging to the G District Police Station G District and the victim I police officers were dispatched to the said G District.

Defendant C and Defendant A provided that the police officers arriving at the site stated that the Defendants “I am out of the time slick, so I am out of the Defendants,” and Defendant A was the victim, and Defendant A was the victim of whom I am.

must be resolved within the extent;

Does us do not go against us;

What is other than why they go beyond;

Does it be a biased investigation;

C. Dried fluorch fluorch fluorch

“A police officer was pushed down his chest while taking a bath.”

Accordingly, although police officers notified that they could be arrested Defendant A due to interference with the performance of official duties, Defendant A, who continued to take care of Defendant C, who was in the vicinity of Defendant C while taking a bath without disregarding it, faced with the wall of the I police officer, and exceeded the floor, and Defendant B, who was next to the defect that the H police officer tried to arrest Defendant A as the current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties, was arrested.

"In doing so, I spit spite spits more than twice on the part of the face and head of I spite, and spite twice the head of I spite two times on the part of the head, and the defendant C was on the side of I spite, and the head of H spite and I spite spite spite that I spite I spite I spite I spite, and I spite I spite I spite I spite I s

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 reporting processing duties.