Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on February 13, 2015 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Industrial Safety and Health Act in the Cheongju District Court Support on February 13, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 24th of the same month.

[2] On February 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the Defendant to present an identification card in order to verify his/her personal information in the Esing practice place, which is located in Boan-si, where the Defendant: (b) on February 27, 2016, around 20:50, after receiving a report from customers (hereinafter referred to as “Nan-si”); (c) on the part of the Defendant, he/she went out of the singing room; and (d) on the part of the Defendant, he/she came to know of his/her personal information; and (e) on the part of the Defendant, he/she was reported by H police officers to go to the singing room; and (e) on the part of the Defendant, he/she did not have any young head

Doescirs, bombs

“I sweared as “,” and Habman’s attempt not to take a bath.

하자 “ 아들뻘 되는 놈이 싸가지가 좆 나 없네

”라고 하면서 두 손으로 H 순경의 가슴을 1회 밀고, 멱살을 잡고 발로 허벅지를 찼다.

As a result, G and H police officers attempted to arrest the defendant as a current criminal interfering with the performance of official duties, together with the defendant.

I, “I have been arrested by such person.”

"I am this, I am to arrest? I am to this extent? I am to the G Inspector who explained the reason for arrest as a current offender of interference with the performance of official duties.

“Abbandoned as a bandon, and assaulted as a baton, the G baton.”

As a result, there is a defect that G is attempting to arrest I as a current offender that interferes with the performance of official duties, and the defendant was facing the reason that G was about the boom.

H Violenced on a bridge of a patrol officer, including a bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant and I conspired with the police officer to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of I by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to J, H and G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history, etc.;