logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.05.29 2014고정476
결혼중개업의관리에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the international marriage brokerage business under the trade name of "C".

1. An international marriage broker shall obtain personal information, including the marriage history, health status, criminal records (sexual assault, domestic violence, and sexual traffic), occupation, etc. certified in the relevant country from a user of international marriage brokerage and the other party to international marriage, and provide the user of international marriage and the other party with such information in writing;

Nevertheless, on August 23, 2012, the Defendant entered into an international marriage brokerage agreement with E and 10,80,000 won at A and B offices of the second floor D and C offices on September 2, 2012. On September 2, 2012, the Defendant left Korea with E and Vietnam on September 2, 2012, and did not provide the personal information (Marriage, health status, occupation, and criminal record) of Vietnam women, who are the parties to international marriage, in writing, and arranged to look at 20,00 Vietnam women, who are not registered, with 30 persons.

Accordingly, the defendant has mediated international marriage without providing the personal information of the other party to international marriage brokers in writing.

2. No international marriage broker shall introduce two or more other parties to a user at the same time, in introducing a contact to an international marriage broker;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time, and at the place mentioned in the above Paragraph 1., made 7-8 women in Vietnam, who are international marriage brokers E, in good order.

In such a way, approximately 20 - approximately 30 women in Vietnam were arranged to look at the same time and at the same place as those of Vietnam women, and E stated “I (J)” in the indictment for H students, but appears to be a clerical error. The evidence records Nos. 18, 19 (see, e.g., title 2-2, 2-2, 18, 19) were selected as new parts.

Accordingly, the defendant introduced two or more Vietnam women at the same time and place as the user in mediating international marriage.

arrow