logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.26 2017가단5158682
자문료지급
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The Plaintiff asserts that the introduction of Defendant B, a second shareholder of Defendant C, entered into a service contract with the Defendant Company, and that the Plaintiff provided consulting services, such as contact with a foreign company and consultation on the method of preparation of a business plan, for four months with respect to the Defendant Company’s LED business, and that the Defendants filed a claim against the Defendants for payment of KRW 32 million as compensation for damages arising from the unilateral destruction of the contract and in preliminary return of unjust enrichment.

However, even according to all the proof of the plaintiff, a service contract was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant company.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants acquired benefits due to the Plaintiff’s performance of duties, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow