1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Defendant made an oral advisory contract at the request of the Defendant to give advice from the Defendant (U.S. District Court Decision 2014Gahap3587, Jun. 2, 2014) regarding the right to purchase and sell the network D (the Defendant’s 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's ''

B. The aforementioned advisory contract was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the sole basis of the testimony of the witness E and the evidence presented by the Plaintiff, as the result of the determination.

It is not sufficient to recognize the fact that the plaintiff has ordered the defendant to provide tax advice equivalent to KRW 11 million, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(M) 2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.