1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(2) The reasoning of the lower court’s judgment on October 18, 2018 is without merit and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff, while filing an appeal, did not significantly differ from the contents alleged in the first instance trial. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone: (a) the construction contract of this case was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant by acting as an authorized agent or by acting as an expression agent under Articles 125 and 126 of the Civil Act; (b) the Plaintiff’s execution of construction works, and (c) the Defendant used KRW 30 million deposited in its own account; (b) there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff made any profit or the Defendant used KRW 12,00,000,000,000,000 from the account in its name. However, according to the reasoning of the lower court’s appeal, the Plaintiff’s appeal is justifiable, and thus, is dismissed.