beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, around 13:30 on March 22, 2014, around 13:30 on the street in Chuncheon City, followed with the victim B (the age of 76). On the ground that he did not properly settle the fertilizer value of KRW 200,000,000, which was received six years prior to the appraisal, the victim, who was satisfeed with the victim, and who was satisfed with the victim’s breath, “hum flade and fladdson’s flab,” and fladd
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant A's partial statement
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness B and F’s respective legal statements;
1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 260 (1) of the same Act
1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of the workhouse
1. The main point of the argument is that the defendant's act is an act to defend the victim's defense first and then the victim's defense is excluded from illegality.
2. According to each legal statement made by the witness B and F, the Defendant’s “a friend friend and friend friend,” is found to have been aware of the fact that the Defendant friended the victim, fribbbbbbling the bridge, frithing the brith, and frithing the brith, and did not constitute an unlawful violation, such as the victim’
Thus, since the defendant's act cannot be seen as self-defense, the above argument is rejected.
Division of Non-Offense
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) Defendant B, at the time and place as indicated in the judgment, and for the same reasons as indicated in the judgment with the victim A (78 years old); (b) brought an injury to the victim, such as a bad appearance open room, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.
2. According to the evidence submitted by the public prosecutor, the fact that the victim was injured by his/her hosa while facing the hosa cited by the defendant is recognized.
Furthermore, the health care unit is about whether the defendant was able to get off the victim's face due to the care of the defendant.