logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.10.17 2014고단889
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) came to know that the Defendant and C stayed in the victim E (the 53 years of age) at the time when the Defendant living together and resided together with C before towing, the Defendant raised an objection thereto. On June 24, 2014, at around 05:00, the Defendant found the apartment as the above apartment with a head of mi (30cm in length and 19cc in length on the day) which is a dangerous object, and divided it into the first race. However, the Defendant, who did not answer, went back with the victim, who was living together with C, and went back to the house with the victim.

The defendant, within the house, she was able to kill the victim, she was fluent of whether she is a house within the house, and female vagabonds, which may be said, and the victim was able to do so, and the victim was able to take a part of the face of the victim by she displayed the above her head toward the victim, thereby facing about one week of treatment, thereby leading the victim to two open measures requiring approximately one week of treatment.

2. A thief: (a) around 14:00 on May 201, 201, the Defendant stolen the victim’s net gold bars owned by the victim who had been living together at the time and kept in the inner harassment by using the gaps of the victim C, which were located in the inner harassment, at least 2 points, 1 points, 1 point, 1 point, and 6 million won in total, and 1 million won in market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each testimony of witness E and C;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim E, because the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim E, and that the defendant gave prior consent of the victim C. However, according to the evidence above, the defendant carried the defense room. The defendant carried the defense room.

arrow