Defendant

Long-term (prosecutions) and electives (public trials)

Attorney Lee Gi-ia

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

The Defendant is the representative of the “○○○○○○○○△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△§ 25, February 25, 2014, and the Defendant did not file a business report with the competent authority, while running a beauty business managing the skin by using

2. Determination

As to the facts charged in this case that the Defendant, while running beauty business, did not report as prescribed by the Public Health Control Act, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant did not violate the above Act, since the Defendant’s business does not constitute “maid art business”.

Article 2(1)5 of the Public Health Control Act provides that the business of beauty art business refers to the business of making the appearance of customers beautiful by taking good care of the faces, hair, skin, etc. of customers. Article 4(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Public Health Control Act provides that the business of beauty art business is subdivided into beauty art business. In particular, in the case of beauty art business related to skin, it is the business of analyzing the skin condition, skin management, hair, eyebrow, eyebrow, etc. that does not use medical devices or medicines.

Article 20 of the Public Health Act provides that “A public health business entity who intends to report a public health business pursuant to Article 3(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Public Health Act shall submit a report in a form that meets the standards for facilities and equipment of each type of public health business under Article 2, and thus, violates the Public Health Control Act because the Defendant’s business constitutes a business of careing customers.” However, Article 3(1) of the same Act provides that “A person who fails to report under the former part of Article 3(1) of the same Act constitutes a penal provision for a person who fails to report under the former part of Article 3(1) of the same Act; and Article 3(1) of the same Act provides that “A person who intends to report a public health business pursuant to the former part of Article 3(1) of the same Act shall submit a report in a form that meets the standards for facilities and equipment of public health business under Article 2, and thus, it is difficult to deem the Defendant to be acquitted of a medical device under Article 7(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Public Health Control Act.”

Judges Lee Jin-hwa