Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court for the same year.

4.5. The person for whom the above sentence has become final and conclusive.

1. On June 10, 2012, the Defendant interfered with business affairs from around 23:00 on June 10, 2012 to 23:20 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the general restaurant business affairs of the victim by force of 20 minutes, such as: (a) the Defendant, who was found in the “D cafeteria” operated by the victim C, located in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, demanded food from the “D cafeteria”; and (b) the Defendant, who called “the victim would not interfere with his/her business.” (c) the Defendant, who was aware of the fact that he/she reads “the victim would not interfere with his/her business.” (d) the Defendant, who

2. On June 15, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s general restaurant business by force for 20 minutes, such as: (a) from around 23:00 to around 23:30 on June 15, 2012, the Defendant drinking alcohol on the street side of the cafeteria of the D cafeteria, as described in paragraph (1) and leaving the entrance to the cafeteria without any justifiable reason; and (b) preventing customers who had entered the cafeteria from entering the cafeteria by exposing the cafeteria, thereby obstructing the victim’s general restaurant business.

3. On June 23, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s general restaurant business by force for 20 minutes, such as drinking alcohol remaining in an empty space from around 24:00 to 24:20, on June 23, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s general restaurant business by a 20-minute force, such as: (a) leaving the entrance and exit of an empty space without any justifiable reason; and (b) preventing customers who had entered the restaurant from entering the restaurant.

4. On June 28, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s general restaurant business duties by force for 30 minutes, such as: (a) the Defendant, from around 22:00 to around 23:00 on June 28, 2012, on the ground that the Defendant was forced from the victim to control the opening distance on the table table where customers are seated by the victim; (b) the Defendant was unable to enter the restaurant by cutting an empty bottle with the entrance; and (c) the Defendant interfered with the victim’s general restaurant business duties by force.

5. On July 2, 2012, the Defendant who obstructed business operations from around 23:00 on July 2, 2012.