logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.03.22 2016고단130
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. In around 11:00 on October 20, 2015, the Defendant collected the admission fee of D cultural heritage from Masan-gun B located in the entrance fee of the Maju-Gun, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “Woo-do without this farb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kbb kbb kb kbb kb.”

B. On October 29, 2015, the Defendant, at around 09:0 on October 29, 2015, when a trial expense was created with G in the same place as described in the preceding paragraph on the same grounds as that stated in the preceding paragraph with the victim who was working in the same place as that stated in the preceding paragraph, and the Defendant, upon receiving a report from the victim, publicly insulting the victim by saying, “I am, at that time, I am?” and called “I am, at that time, I am?” and called, “I am, at that time, I am.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

On February 5, 2016, the victim E, after institution of the prosecution, revoked the complaint against the defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow