The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On August 20, 2014, at around 01:16, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “A victim D (Nam, 46 years of age) who was a taxi engineer E, etc. who was requested to pay taxi expenses, who was called out after receiving a report from a taxi engineer and a taxi driver on the front side of the B apartment in Yasan-si, Yasan-si, Yasan-si, the Defendant: (a) called “A frich frich frich, frich frich frich frich frich, frich fri frich frich fri fri fri

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the statement in the letter of withdrawal of the complaint filed on November 28, 2014 after the institution of public prosecution, the victim can have withdrawn the complaint against the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.