logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2020.02.12 2019고단1409
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 5, 2019, the Defendant, “2019 Highest 1409,” stated that the Defendant would send the goods to the victim M who reported and contacted the sale of the goods by inserting an article to the Internet K Kaf, and would send the price of the goods to the victim M.

However, since the defendant did not possess the above goods, even if he receives the price of the goods from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the goods to the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 80,000 won from the victim’s N account (O) in the name of the Defendant, and received from around that time to November 8, 2019 totaling KRW 15,560,000 from the victims over 13 times as shown in the annexed Crime List.

"2019 Highest 144"

1. On November 13, 2019, the victim B, who had access to the Internet K L site, concluded that the Defendant would send the goods to the victim B who had reported and contacted the sales of the goods by accessing the Internet K L site and selling the Kameras (EOS 5D MARK4 Ors) and sirens (24-70).

However, since the defendant did not possess the above goods, even if he receives the price for the goods from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the goods to the victim.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received 3.5 million won from the victim’s PUnion account in the name of the Defendant.

2. On November 19, 2019, the victim R Co., Ltd.: (a) sent an article to the victim R who had contacted with the Internet K L site by accessing the Internet K L site; and (b) sent the article first to the victim R who had contacted with the said article by reporting the fact.

However, since the defendant did not possess the above goods, even if he receives the price for the goods from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the goods to the victim.

The defendant.

arrow