logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2012.08.21 2012고단1322 (1)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, along with the loan hub B, C (one name D division), separated co-defendant E (the judgment of July 10, 2012), was made only by the document examination without due diligence, with the loan of employee house lease fund to workers and ordinary people in the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, E is a lessee's behavior, and the defendant is willing to obtain the employee house lease fund from the financial institution by preparing documents to obtain the loan by preparing a false lease contract by preparing a false lease contract with the lessor's behavior.

On July 2011, the Defendant, along with B, C, and E, prepared a false contract with the G office located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, as if the Defendant leased the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H multi-household 102 to 85 million won deposit, and C, around that time, made a false certificate of employment as he/she worked as a management officer in the J department located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I.

Since then, around August 22, 2011, E submitted a false lease contract, false employment certificate, etc. prepared as above to the employee in charge of loan who pretends to borrow a normal employee's house lease fund and whose name is unknown at the point of the extension of the victim bank in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

After all, the defendant, in collusion with B, C, and E, deceivings the victim, and he, from August 26, 201, transferred 57 million won to the head of a national bank in the name of the defendant to the head of a Tong in the name of the defendant for a deposit account for workers' house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol on the accused and E;

1. The police statement of K;

1. Investigation report (Binding of the J office lease contract, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response to requests for details of financial transactions;

1. Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act:

arrow