1. All appeals from the Plaintiff and Defendant Melio Co., Ltd. are dismissed.

2. The expansion from the trial.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) recognition and public notice of the project - name of the project: B development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Public notice of the project: C-Public notice of the Ulsan-gun in Ulsan Metropolitan City on September 2, 2010: N in public notice of the Ulsan-gun on March 22, 2012; Defendant:

B. The Defendant Commission’s ruling of acceptance on June 27, 2012 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of acceptance”) - The object of expropriation is as indicated in the following list of objects of expropriation:

(hereinafter referred to as the “land of this case” by the sequence Nos. 1, 2, and 3; however, the land is referred to as the “each of the instant lands” and the land No. 4 is referred to as the “instant grave”: The following list of objects to be expropriated is as indicated.

- Date of commencement of expropriation: Certified Public Appraisal Corporation, the Pacific Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Appraisal Board”) on August 21, 2012

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on June 20, 2013 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the following list of objects to be expropriated (hereinafter “instant objection”):

- An appraisal corporation: A new appraisal corporation in the future, one appraisal corporation, and one appraisal corporation (hereinafter in this case’s appraisal of the appraisal of the instant appraisal) (hereinafter in this case’s appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the instant appraisal), the amount of the adjudication of acceptance subject to the owner’s expropriation (won), Plaintiff 1, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. 239§³ 30,838,850,850 32,901,400 31,82 733,555,102 782 73,616,400 730,000 U.S., Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. 38,730,00 m2 of the adjudication subject to the expropriation (hereinafter in this case’s appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal)

D. On August 20, 2012, Defendant Company deposited KRW 793,415,050 for compensation following the above ruling of acceptance, and KRW 52,53,950 for the difference between the above ruling of acceptance and the ruling of acceptance on July 18, 2013, and the Plaintiff reserved an objection against KRW 793,415,050 for compensation following the said ruling of acceptance.