1. Defendant Melaland Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 20,674,300 and its amount from August 22, 2012 to August 2014.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Designation and public notice of industrial complex - Business name: B development project approval date: B (hereinafter “instant project”): The public notice of Ulsan-gun in Ulsan Metropolitan City on September 2, 2010 - Project operator: Defendant Melio Sealand (hereinafter “Defendant Melio Sealand”);

B. The adjudication of expropriation on June 27, 2012 by the local land expropriation committee of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”): D 239m2, E, 497m2, F 11,82m2m2 (hereinafter “D land,” “E land,” “F land,” and the combination thereof is referred to as “instant land”), G ground burial grounds (hereinafter “instant grave”) - Compensation for losses: D land 20,291,100, E land E 30,838,850, F land 73,555,100, F land 8,730,000, 8,7300m2, F land - The Korea Appraisal and Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Appraisal and Appraisal Corporation”) on August 21, 2012; and the Korea Appraisal and Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Appraisal and Appraisal Corporation”);

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on June 20, 2013 (hereinafter “instant objection”): Compensation for losses: D land 21,701,200, E land 32,901,400, F land 782,616,400, and dismissal of an objection against the instant grave

D. On August 20, 2012, Defendant Melaland deposited KRW 793,415,050 as compensation pursuant to the above confinement ruling and KRW 52,53,950 as of July 18, 2013, and received the Plaintiff’s objection without reservation.

[Basis] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, 5-3, 4, 6, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 2-1, 2, 3, 3-1, 2, and 4-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The instant expropriation ruling by the local Land Tribunal of Ulsan Metropolitan City, Ulsan Metropolitan City, on the Plaintiff’s assertion, violated the duty of good faith consultation as follows.