1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: E development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Public notice: F-Public notice of Ulsan-gun in Ulsan Metropolitan City on September 2, 2010: G-Project operator public notice of Ulsan-gun on March 22, 2012; Defendant:

B. The ruling of expropriation made on June 27, 2012 by the Ulsan Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): The following is indicated in the column of “land subject to expropriation” in the list of land:

(hereinafter referred to as “number” refers to the “land of this case” in accordance with the number stated below, and the combination thereof is referred to as “each land of this case” - Compensation for losses: The amount of adjudication on expropriation” as indicated below on the list of land below.

- Date of commencement of expropriation: Certified Public Appraisal Corporation, the Pacific Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Appraisal Board”) on August 21, 2012

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated June 20, 2013 - Compensation for losses: The same shall be as indicated in the following list of land:

- An appraisal corporation: A corporation with a new appraisal corporation in the future, one appraisal corporation (hereinafter “the appraisal of this case”) number 1 A/220 shares of 55/220 shares of 2,61,751,550 m2 shares of 376 m2, each of 1,803/80 shares of 1,89,360, 3603, and 1,800 shares of 83.5/80,000 shares of 376 m2, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul-gun, for each of 226 m20 shares of 55/20 shares of 2,613,220 shares of 3,958/3,916 shares of 3,916 m2,958/3,916 shares of 1,805/10,740,710/70 shares of 1,97

D. The Defendant deposited the full amount of the compensation determined by the ruling of acceptance and the increased compensation in the ruling of acceptance, and the Plaintiffs reserved and received the objection.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap No. 1.