1. The Defendant’s each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 13,384,980, as well as 5% per annum from August 22, 2012 to April 10, 2014.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: E development project - the FF published by Ulsan-gun on September 2, 2010, and G published on March 22, 2012 - The defendant

B. The expropriation ruling by the Ulsan Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal on June 27, 2012 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”) - The expropriation object is indicated as follows in the partitions of “land subject to expropriation” in the list of land lists:

(hereinafter referred to as the “number” number shall be referred to as the “land Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this case” in accordance with the partitions, and shall be collectively referred to as the “each land of this case” - Compensation for losses: It shall be as shown in the partitions of “the amount of adjudication on expropriation” on the list below the land list.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation: the Pacific Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Appraisal Board”) for the appraisal of the resolution of expropriation of this case on August 21, 2012

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection on June 20, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) - Compensation for losses: as indicated in the column of “the amount of objection” as indicated below the list of land lists.

- An appraisal corporation: each of the 2,613,120 shares of 55/220 shares of 2,61,751,550 20 shares of 376 square meters in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and 83.5/805 shares of 1,80,803,803,800 shares of 1,89,360,3603, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul-gun, and 376 square meters in each of 1,80,80 shares of 376 square meters in 376 square meters in 1,80,89,360, and 1,958/3,916 square meters in each of 3,00,000,003,000,07,081,07,001,05,718/10,740,000 shares in each of 1,7407.

D. The Defendant deposited the full amount of the compensation determined by the ruling of acceptance and the increased compensation in the ruling of acceptance, and the Plaintiffs reserved and received the objection.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 3, 4, and Eul evidence 1 to 4 (including numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply).