A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:50 on April 20, 2014, the Defendant asked questions as to whether the Defendant paid the drinking value from the police officer F, who was a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-dong Police Station E-gu Seoul Police Station E-gu, Seoul who called up after receiving 112 a report to the effect that “the Defendant would not pay the drinking value”, and whether or not the Defendant paid the drinking value from G, who was a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station E-gu, Seoul. The Defendant was a prosecutor at the prosecutor’s office as to whether he would go to go to go to, but the passenger vessel was sunken, and the students died, but the Defendant was called to go to this day without such a day. Whether the Defendant was called to go to the said day is the police officer, and the Defendant expressed that the chest of the above F was able to do so once again by assaulting him, and then the chest was 2 times as the chest of the said G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' performance of duties concerning handling reports and maintaining order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to H, I and J;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., deposit of one million won each for police officers and police officers, the fact that police officers do not have any injury, and the fact that police officers do not have any previous record of the same kind);