Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피해자 B에 대한 폭행 및 모욕 피고인은 2016. 9. 6. 01:50경 대리운전기사인 피해자 B(58세)의 운전으로 목적지인 서울 송파구 C에 도착하였는데, 피해자로부터 ‘목적지에 도착하였으니 일어나시라’는 말을 듣자 기분나쁘다는 이유로 피해자에게 ‘뭐야. 이 개새끼야’라고 욕설하며 피해자의 가슴을 주먹으로 2회 때리고 그의 얼굴을 향해 때릴 것처럼 위협하여 피해자를 폭행하고, 계속하여 주위에 행인이 있고 출동한 경찰관들이 듣고 있는 가운데 ‘야이 개새끼야. 병신 같은 새끼야. 내가 너 얼굴 기억해 놨어. 이 씹할새끼야. 죽여버린다. 내가 너 이 새끼 대리비를 왜 주냐.’라고 소리쳐 약 20분간 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. In the same date, at the same time, and at the same place as the above 1.1, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims by 20 minutes, stating that “picker, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangseo Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report, was fluored around the victim D and E, who was the police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangseo Police Station, and that he was fluored by B,” and that “picker, a police officer, was fluort, and the police officer, who was fluort. The police officer, must fluort the same fluort. In line with the foregoing fluort.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol protocol to B, D, and E;

1. Article 260 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, including the circumstances leading to the instant crime, degree of damage, etc.