The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who works as a co-child care teacher at the “E” childcare center.

At around 11:30 on April 17, 2014, the Defendant divided meals into meals to other children in the Cluriba group of the “E” Child Care Center F, G (3 years) of the Defendant left the front of the classroom, leaving the victim in front of the classroom. The Defendant saw the victim into the outside of the classroom by cutting the victim’s joint arms, leaving the victim into the classroom, opening the door again and entering the classroom, leaving the victim’s arms, leaving the classroom, preventing the victim from entering the classroom by opening the classroom and leaving the classroom, and allowing the victim to wear the classroom by cutting the victim’s arms going to the classroom continuously going to the classroom.

Accordingly, the defendant committed emotional abuse that harms the mental health and development of children.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant and his defense counsel did not allow the defendant to enter the G (hereinafter referred to as "subject child") by putting the classroom of the facts charged, and that the defendant committed the same act as stated in the remaining facts charged, but such act was done for the development of the subject child's decoration, and that the above act does not constitute emotional abuse against the subject child.

3. Among the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, there are the Defendant’s statements and CCTV images of child-care centers, which are directly admitted as evidence of the facts charged in the instant case (other evidence is merely a statement or presentation based on the above evidence by a third party who was not at the site of the instant case). Based on such evidence, the determination of whether the Defendant’s emotional abuse against the child involved was committed

In full view of the Defendant’s statement and CCTV screen and video CD (CCTV - G57316E - 04 - 2017 - 15724.avi) submitted by the Defendant’s defense counsel, the Defendant refuses to use the child involved for occupation.