logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.14 2018고단560
아동학대범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(아동복지시설종사자등의아동학대가중처벌)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From December 26, 2012, the Defendant worked as a child care teacher of the D Childcare Center located in B-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul, as the first floor of B-dong, and from March 28, 2016, the Defendant was taking care of the Defendant’s child F (2 years) who is a child victim E-child in the above childcare center, the Defendant was taking charge of the Defendant’s seat.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Education Crimes (Punishment of persons engaged in child welfare facilities, etc. among the school cost of children);

A. On October 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 13:19 on October 17, 2016, the Defendant, without any reason, prevented the victimized child, who was satisfed in the class E of the above child care center, from leaving the satisf’s satisf’s satisf’s satf’s head next to the sat

B. On October 24, 2016, from around 11:50 to around 12:25, the Defendant: (a) had other originals of the above E provide meals at the same place; (b) had the victimized child observe the appearance of meals for other children without eating; and (c) neglected to protect the appearance of meals for other children; and (d) caused the victimized child to wear.

(c)

On October 26, 2016, from around 11:54 to 12:27, the Defendant had other children of the above E share the same at the same place, and had the victimized children observe the appearance of meals for other children, thereby preventing the victimized children from taking the brusing the brus of the victimized children, which are the same quality as other children.

As a result, the Defendant committed emotional abuse that harms on the mental health and development of victimized children who are subject to protection three times in total, as childcare staff who are obliged to report child abuse.

2. On November 30, 2016, from around 14:29 to around 15:49, the Defendant obstructed the management of CCTV video information in the said G by deleting the gap in which there is no president G of the said G, while checking the video recording of CCTV in the said Class E at the head of the said D Child Care Center from around November 30, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, G, and I;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.

arrow