beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 2, 2016, the Defendant, at around 03:58, 03:58, worked for the owner and the trial expenses in the Dcarbook in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that the drinking value payment is changed to the victim E (the age of 49) who is a customer and the victim F (the age of 45) who is working for a day-to-day, b) when the face of the victim E is taken as drinking, and b) when the head and face of the victim E is taken as drinking, b) when the head and face of the victim F are taken back by drinking, and b) when the victim F is cut back to her, and assaulted the victim F by assaulting the victim E.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of CCTV image photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 257 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose the penalty, and imprisonment with prison labor;
1. Sentencing Guidelines of 1 general injury: 2 months from April to June from June of year 1 to 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: A special general penal person who must explain only the crime of injury in the judgment: A special general penal person who has no corresponding punishment: A sentence of imprisonment in the basic area (from April to June 1): A person who is under six months: A person who has been sentenced to imprisonment in June: A person who has not been sentenced to imprisonment for recovery of injury, cumulative amount of punishment (up to 12 times of suspended sentence), absence of a public decision after receipt of a writ of summons, etc.: A confession and separate case (the first instance court of Seoul East East Eastern District Court of Appeals: 4/2 years of suspended sentence of imprisonment (Seoul East East East District Court Decision 2016Dadan198).