A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2016, the Defendant was reported in front of the “C” restaurant located in the Daegu Northern District B, Daegu Northern District, on June 21, 2016, and reported by the Defendant that the Defendant would threaten D, E, etc., and was called up to G with the F District Police Station 1 Team of the Daegu Northern Northern District Police Station, Daegu, that was called up by the Defendant, “Ne bit bitch bitch bitch xch xch xch xch xch

C. A Ba Creh’s bath, she was fluored once a year in which G was sent, and H she was fluored by her hand, and she was fluored by “Ch, fluort, fluort, fluort, fluort, fluort, fluort, fluort fluort,” and she brut H’s face, respectively, with his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Place of work;

1. A detailed statement of the processing of reported cases;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the grounds for sentencing) is [the scope of recommendations] and the basic area (from June to January to April) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the grounds for sentencing) (the grounds for sentencing) (the grounds for sentencing) (the grounds for obstructing the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (the person subject to special sentencing from June to January to April) is not a person subject to a suspended sentence (the decision of sentencing): The offense committed by the defendant by

The defendant is in depth against the favorable circumstances.

There is no criminal history of the defendant, which exceeds the same criminal record or fine.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and result of the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by considering the following factors.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On June 21, 2016, the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged is in front of a cafeteria “C” restaurant located in Daegu Northern-gu B, Daegu, Daegu, on June 21, 2016, the victim D (n, 30 years of age) and the victim E (n, 80 years of age).