logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.04.07 2016고단188
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 23, 2016, from around 09:10 to around 09:23 the same day, the Defendant: (a) used an E-tax operated by the victim D to return to the destination; (b) refused payment of KRW 10,00 out of KRW 13,00; and (c) refused payment of the remainder to the victim, on the ground that the victim had returned to the destination after having returned to the destination.

The spits, such as spits, spits, etc., which are brine by taking a bath, and opening the door of taxi driver's seat once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's taxi business by force.

2. On January 23, 2016, at the above location around 09:23, the Defendant: (a) requested a police officer of the Changwon Police Station affiliated with the Changwon Police Station, who was called out after receiving the report of the above D, to leave the taxi to verify the circumstances of the instant case; (b) “Is the weather inside the taxi would be why it would be why it would be?”

whoever is in the Republic of Korea;

C C Doz. Doz. Doz.

“To perform the bath,” and assaulted F at one time by drinking alcohol.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of field photographs (No. 1 and 2 No. 1 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution are as follows: The scope of final sentencing due to multiple crimes for which there are no basic areas (for example, six months to one year and six months) (for example, interference with the execution of official duties) [the scope of recommended punishment] (for example, interference with the performance of official duties] (for six months to one year and four months) (for example, interference with the performance of official duties). The scope of final sentencing due to multiple crimes for which there are no basic areas (for example, six months to one year and four months): six months to two years.

arrow