logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.01.24 2017고합632
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged were partially revised to the extent that it does not affect the defendant's right of defense.

【2018 High 572’s 2018 High Ma572’s / 2012’s / The Defendant was a person working at the C Welfare Center in Bupyeong-si, B (hereinafter “C Welfare Center”), and the victim D was the head of the above welfare center, and the head of the above welfare center E heard the awareness that F was pregnant on the job without the F of the above welfare center employee E, and the head of the above welfare center was employed on the job without the two children’s plan in light of the F interview. The Defendant expressed his opinion to the effect that “The F shall be dismissed in full,” and the Defendant officially recognized the above speech and demanded the victim to have a discrimination and infringement of human rights at the welfare center level, and to express his/her open position.”

Around June 26, 2015, the Defendant was notified of the termination of a labor contract by the welfare center, and on August 10, 2015, the Defendant filed a petition with the National Human Rights Commission of Korea for gender discrimination, violation of human rights, and unfair dismissal. The National Human Rights Commission dismissed the Defendant’s petition with the purport that “The Defendant’s termination of a labor contract is unfair in addition to the expiration of a labor contract,” on May 31, 2016, without any further remedy in light of the fact that “E was submitted at the above welfare center and E was subject to the intention at a plenary meeting.”

【Criminal Facts】

On June 10, 2016, the Defendant posted a false statement of slander 2, 1, 2, 4. The following facts: (a) although the victim was dismissed or the victim made a gender discrimination statement, etc. in his own G in order to retaliation the same act as the above facts committed by the Defendant, the Defendant did not publish a false statement of slander2 against the victim: (b) even though he did not have any more equal circumstances, (c) sexual discrimination, infringement of human rights, retaliation, and (d) he was jointly and severally for the non-discrimination world, the complainant who is the responsible person shall resign.

arrow