logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.25 2016나8860
용역비
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of the pertinent part as follows. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A portion used for adding or cutting;

A. On the 2nd page 5-6 of the first instance judgment, “A evidence Nos. 4-1 through 4” in the first instance judgment, the Defendant asserts that “A evidence Nos. 6-2, 8, 9, 10-1, and 2-1 of the evidence Nos. 4 are forged on the basis of the entire purport of the oral argument.” The Defendant added the written estimate for construction of F-1 of the evidence No. 4, prior to October 2010, since the delivery drawings were the date of August 2010, and the written estimate for construction of F-1 of the evidence No. 4 was the date of the written estimate No. 4-2, 6-2, 8, 9, 10-1, and 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that each of the above estimates was forged on the basis of the written estimates No. 4-2, 6-2, 8-9, 10-1, and 2.”

B. In full view of the overall purport of evidence No. 2, No. 6 of the first instance judgment, “208.4.4.2” as “202,” and “the fact that the defendant sent” of No. 3, No. 10 through No. 14 of the evidence No. 3-1 of the evidence No. 3, No. 13, No. 7, and No. 8 of the evidence No. 1, No. 2, No. 2, No. 5, No. 7, and No. 11 of the evidence No. 2, No. 6 of the second instance judgment, the plaintiff issued a request from the defendant for rescue design, etc. and delivered the design drawings, etc. to the defendant from around 2002 to Oct. 1, 2015.”

C. On the third and sixth page of the first instance judgment, the following judgments are added.

In addition, the defendant's portion of "F 1,600,000 won on July 2, 2010, and 1,600,000 won on October 2, 2010, which was not paid by the owner of the building.

arrow