logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.22 2018나80645
부당이득금반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance by the court of first instance are as follows, and they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, on the grounds that the reasoning of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance, except for the addition

2. A portion used for adding or cutting;

(a) On the second page of the judgment of the first instance, the addition of the part above shall add 50,000 won per month from August 2003 to November 2004 between the “rent” and “207” during the following three periods:

On the third page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following judgments shall be added between “influence” and “A 1” during the fourth following the period:

"A according to the evidence Nos. 3 and 4-1 of evidence Nos. 4-1, it is recognized that, around May 2015, the Defendant transferred to E Co., Ltd. all the past usage fees and future usage fees claims, and notified D of such transfer, and that, while bringing a lawsuit against E Co., Ltd., upon entering into a lawsuit against D, D and H alleged in the complaint that “I and J agreed to pay to the Defendant for each 400,000 won each month of the payment, and that I and J withdrawn the lawsuit.”

B. The 3rd page 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was written after the trial, has been completed as follows.

A total of KRW 23,866,600 and damages for delay stated in the purport of the claim shall be paid as follows.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion does not have any reason to decide on the preliminary counterclaim.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow