1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The parts to be added or rewritten shall consist of the 2 pages 2, 19 to 3, 2 as follows:

【Third Claim: The Plaintiff claimed KRW 4,073,850 through a transaction statement dated June 30, 2012, but KRW 507,700 among them is limited to the Defendant’s Jinyang Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Jinyang Industry”).

2) On the other hand, on the other hand, the traffic signs are subject to double payment. . . .) On the other hand, on the other hand, the 4. 9 to 12 are subject to double payment.

No. 3. The No. 8-1, No. 8-2, No. 9-1, No. 9-2, and No. 9-2, the Defendant’s evidence alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant purchased traffic signs, etc. from the Jinyang industry and used them for the construction work executed by the Plaintiff. There is no ground to deem that the Plaintiff and Jinyang industry demanded double payment of the same goods against the Defendant, or that the amount the Jinyang industry received was paid by the Plaintiff. Rather, according to the purport of the entire arguments and arguments, it is recognized that the Plaintiff purchased traffic signs, etc. from Jinyoung Industrial, National Highway, and National Road Safety Co., Ltd. and used them directly for the construction work." The Defendant added the following judgments to the allegations added in

The defendant asserts that even though the plaintiff did not perform the "D and E-B Loans" construction around July 2013, the defendant claims construction cost of KRW 12,300,000 for false claims.

The plaintiff did not issue a tax invoice for the above construction work, and registered with the Korea Specialized Construction Association, according to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 11 and 12.