logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.11.13 2020누10233
부정당업자 입찰 참가자격 제한처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment on this case by the court of first instance, which cited the judgment on this case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of using the "Plaintiff Gwangju Regional Government Procurement Service" in the fifth to the "Gwanju Regional Government Procurement Service" in the second 11th of the judgment of the court of first instance as the "6. 17 June 2015", and the third 3rd of the third 3rd, respectively.

Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) In addition, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s claim was not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s claim in the first instance court, and that of the first instance court that did not accept the Plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s claim was groundless.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow