1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. The dismissal part of the first instance judgment is the fourth 7, 11st 7, 11th 1st 1st 1st 1st 64A5470 "65°5470" respectively.

The fifth 12-13th th th th th th st th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st

In the fifth 16th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the lower court added the following: “Post, some Plaintiffs filed an application for a final appeal against the instant judgment subject to a retrial (Supreme Court Decision 90Meu4461), but the said application was dismissed on June 26, 1990:

The 6th 10th "the same court" in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be "Seoul Criminal District Court."

The second 19th 19th, the second 12th 5th " March 15, 2013," respectively, shall be read as " February 8, 2013."

The 8th 9th "AW" in the judgment of the first instance is raised to "AT".

The 8th sentence of the first instance is referring to “3,09/195,750” in the 8th sentence of the first instance as “3,90/195,750.”

The 15th 10th 10th 15th 15th 10th 10th 2th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd

The third third third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the judgment of civil re-determination on December 6, 1989" as "the judgment subject to a retrial of this case on June 26, 1990".

The 15th to the 17th to the 15th to the following.

The gist of this part of the Defendant’s assertion is as follows: ① The Plaintiffs are not effective in the judgment subject to a retrial, as long as the Defendant was omitted from the Defendant of the instant judgment subject to a retrial (Evidence A (Evidence A 3), and thus, the prior civil judgment (Evidence A 6-1, 2, and 3) still becomes final and conclusive.