The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was sitting the victim D in a book, but the defendant was merely tightly pushed down, and the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered double injury due to that, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the court below acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted at the court below: ① the victim D was a unilateral assault from the defendant on September 19, 2012 and was under treatment at the hospital; ② the investigative agency stated that the defendant was faced with the victim's brut on the book that the victim was bruted by bruting the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the victim's brut with the surrounding person's brut with the victim's b.

Even if the defendant's assault re-explosives the victim's spathy, this is also the defendant's injury to the victim.