logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.09.25 2019고정28
상해
Text

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

[Defendant A] The defendant's office is the general affairs of C-dong Association, and B is a member of C-dong Association.

The defendant was dissatisfied with the law that would be active to members of the same club even though the victim B (the 46-year-old) is not a criminal.

At around 12:00 on July 13, 2018, the Defendant, while communicating with the victim as the above problem, carried out physical fighting, such as cutting the victim's horse, blocking the victim's horse, and giving the victim's arms and body, pushing the victim with his/her hand, pushing the victim with his/her arms and body, pushing the victim with his/her arms and body, resulting in the victim's injury, such as damage of the number of light parts that require treatment for about 56 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. CCTV images at the site of the case;

1. Video CDs;

1. A photographic photo of damage or a caps of dynamic image;

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate and written opinion (No. 8-4, 15 No. 8-4, 15);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the investigation report (the contents of the prosecutor's direction) and his defense counsel asserted that there was a fact that the defendant had fighting with the victim B, but the victim's injury, such as the statement in the judgment, was caused by the slick drive, etc. of the victim, and it was not caused by the defendant's act, and thus there was no causal relationship and there was no possibility of expectation.

According to each of the following facts: (a) the victim has been treated as a part of the E in the face of 3 times around June 2010 at the Einna Council on the following occasions: (b) the investigation report (the content of the prosecutor’s direction), the National Health Insurance Corporation’s reply data (the details of health care benefit in the suspect B), each injury diagnosis statement, opinions of opinion (Evidence No. 8-4, 15), and evidence Nos. 1 and 2 submitted by the defense counsel; (c) the victim has been diagnosed as a part of the Einna Council on three occasions at the F Hospital on the day of the occurrence of the instant case; and (d) the victim was diagnosed as two divers in the face of the einnasium and the tension and the einnasium on the day of the occurrence of the instant case at the F Hospital on the day of the occurrence of the instant case.

arrow