logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.09.21 2018고단2502
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 12, 2017.

1. On May 14, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document and the instant investigation document: (a) at the store located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu B, without D’s consent, the Defendant made use of a black pen to open a mobile phone in the form for the application form for purchase of the mobile phone under the name of the Defendant, and sent the application form in the name of “D”, “E”, “E”, “A”, “A”, and “D” to the account number column in the customer name column, “A”, “A” and “B” to the account number column, and then to exercise the signature in the name of the subscriber column, the Defendant forged one copy of the application form in the name of D, which is a private document related to the rights and obligations of the Plaintiff; and (b) transmitted the forged application form to an employee in charge of the name, who is not aware of the forgery as above, as if the document was duly formed.

2. The defendant who has already possessed the forged or forged official document at the time and place specified in paragraph (1);

D The copy of D’s resident registration certificate can be stored in the computer, and then a copy of D’s resident registration certificate is forged with one copy of D’s resident registration certificate in the name of the head of Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, which is an official document, for the purpose of using the name and the official seal of the head of Gangnam-gu, and used it by electronic facsimile as if it was issued genuinely as to the forged official document’s resident registration certificate.

3. The defrauded filed an application for opening of a mobile phone by transmitting a forged mobile subscription application and a resident registration certificate to an electronic facsimile, as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, as if he/she would normally pay mobile charges and installments to an employee in charge of KT, at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, and by deceiving the victim.

However, facts, the defendant.

arrow