beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant was a customer before a mobile phone sales business entity;
In order to change the mobile phone device of C, it was thought that he had a copy of his identification card in possession of it, and that he received a subsidy from a radio operator by opening an additional mobile phone in the name of C without permission from C.
1. On April 2016, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) stated “C”, “D” in the column of date of birth, and “E in the contact column” in the customer name column of the YY mobile subscription form kept in the YE mobile phone agency located in the YYU-si located in the YYU-si, YU-si; and (b) signed C in the face of the contact column, respectively.
As a result, the defendant set forth one copy of the lele mobile subscription application in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising.
2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place, at the time, and place specified in paragraph 1, issued a copy of the above forged C mobile subscription application in the name of the Defendant, as if he were duly formed, to the employees of KT mobile phone agents, who are not aware of the fact.
3. On April 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) entered C’s resident number “F” in his/her mobile phone agency located in Jeonju-si, through an electronic plaque; and (b) drafted an application for joining.
Accordingly, the defendant used C's resident registration number unlawfully.
4. On April 7, 2016, at the place indicated in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) prepared an application for mobile phone entry in the victim KT’s name and carried out as if he/she obtained C’s consent while preparing an application for mobile phone entry in the said name;
However, the defendant did not have obtained the consent from C, and even if he opened the mobile phone in the name of C, only he thought that he would receive the subsidy provided by the radio operator, and did not have the intention or ability to pay the fees for the mobile phone in the name of C.
Nevertheless, the defendant.