logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2012.05.30 2010고단177
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)등
Text

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) against the Defendants.

Reasons

Parts of innocence

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendants A and B are joint representatives of the E Committee, respectively, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion). Defendants C are the chief executive officer of the said Committee.

The Defendants were aware that the Jindo-gun project coordination committee related to the roads of Jindo-gun for the construction of the F to open in the sub-Gun office of the Jindo-gun located in the Sung-do, Jindo-gun, Jindo-do, and agreed to the above coordination committee and set up their arguments. On January 28, 2010, at around 14:00, the Defendants moved to the sub-Gun office of the said Jindo-gun.

After the completion of the coordination committee related to the construction of water for living in agricultural and fishing villages in the open Gun area, the Defendants demanded that the employees of the Korea Electric Power Corporation waiting in the above attached room be present at the committee for the coordination of the above road-related project to explain their positions to the members of the subordinate Gun room, and the public officials in charge were prevented from entering the subordinate Gun room, and entered into the subordinate Gun room as well as the subordinate Gun room.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly invaded the victim G's room, the head of Jindo-do Gun.

B. In February 2010, Defendant A and C resolved to produce and distribute printed materials with a view to promoting the F-construction opposition position against Gun residents by holding a steering committee at the office of the Jindo-gun Eterrorism Committee in Jindo-gun, Jindo-do.

Defendant

C around that time, Defendant A collected and delivered some of the data necessary for the production of printed materials to Defendant A, and Defendant A produced printed materials that claimed the illegality of the above F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FF project, and “after and after the transmission tower,” by integrating the above data and the data collected by him, and the safety and health of residents.

arrow