A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 17, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment by the Gwangju District Court due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims (Special Robbery, Rape, etc.), and completed the execution of the sentence on October 8, 2012.

1. At around 19:50 on November 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s handets, including KRW 8,500 in cash, one national card, etc., within the victim’s bank owned by the victim; and (b) stolen the victim’s handets at the victim’s control point in Gwangju North-gu Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, by taking advantage of the gap where the victim’s D’s surveillance was neglected; (c)

2. On November 14, 2012, the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act and the Defendant: (a) on November 14, 2012, on board a F taxi operated by the victim E at the location in the Bupyeong-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to arrive at the regular course of business in the same Dong; (b) and (c) on the same way, the Defendant presented the said credit card to pay an amount equivalent to KRW 2,500,00, when she took place as if he

On November 14, 2012, at around 20:36, the Defendant ordered the victim H in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to make payment equivalent to 380,000 won, such as a drinking value, when he/she took place as if he/she had legitimate authority to use the stolen national card.

In this regard, the defendant used stolen credit cards, deceiving victims, and acquired property benefits from the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H and E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each photograph;

1. Each credit card table;

1. Criminal records: The defense counsel held that criminal records, investigation reports by the prosecution (recidion and confirmation), and the status of personal identification and confinement status of the defense counsel at the time of committing the instant crime was physically and mentally disabled due to the shock disorder at the time of committing the instant crime. However, the instant case is asserted to the effect that