The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. On the day of the instant case’s summary of the grounds for appeal, the Defendant completed his duties and took beer at the head office near the house, and the police officers received a report of sexual traffic and received an investigation.

The defendant, who did not have been subject to the control of sexual traffic at an open place, was able to comply with the police officers, and later the employees went to the jurisdiction zone.

The Defendant, who was frightened, left the outside door of the global belt, and the police officer was her seated with the Defendant and her seated with his hand.

The police officer, even though he was fully aware that one behavior of the defendant was committed by opening a district door, changing the door and cutting down the wall, and driving down the wall.

I gathered.

I would like to clarify that it will be at the same time.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the circumstances revealed by the court below, it can sufficiently be recognized that the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of official duties for security, such as protection against the earth, etc., as stated in the judgment below. Thus, the defendant's assertion of mistake in the facts

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.