logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.01 2016가단87394
국가배상 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 7, 2015, the Plaintiff was able to avoid disturbance by the police officers, who were under investigation with the other party in the act of assault as a flagrant offender in the police box of the Fbridge on November 7, 2015.

B. Four police officers were able to wear the Plaintiff, intending to wear the Plaintiff, she followed the Plaintiff, and she was able to wear two knife onto the body following the Plaintiff.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap evidence No. 2 and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The parties' assertion

A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff was shouldered, the Defendants suffered a plucking, plucking, plucking, and plucking a water pipe, a revolving spawn, and a revolving spawn.

When police officers use police gear, they shall use it within the minimum limit necessary.

In such a situation, the Defendants are liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages of KRW 3,594,564 for medical expenses incurred by the Plaintiff, KRW 17,146,657 for lost income, KRW 10,00 for consolation money, and KRW 10,00 for consolation money.

B. The Defendants’ assertion (as to whether Defendant police officers’ unlawful act was committed by Defendant police officers), as the Plaintiff tried to use violence while referring to violence to the other party within the territory of the earth, the Plaintiff was able to boomed, and it was not known that there was a spathn in the Plaintiff’s shoulder, and thus, it is reasonable as a legitimate performance of official duties

Defendant B did not have been on the spot as a district ledger.

Defendant E did not take part in taking part in the preparation of documents.

3. According to the overall purport of each of the voice and images of evidence Nos. 10 and 8, evidence Nos. 10 and 8, evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and all of the arguments, the following facts can be acknowledged. According to the facts of this recognition, it is difficult to recognize the defendants' tort.

The plaintiff and the plaintiff-friendly G called the plaintiff's shoulder that the plaintiff operated the shoulder, so they called a magazine.

G is agricultural colonia.

arrow